Youtube Counter Strike Willkommen bei GameStar!
COUNTER-STRIKE: GLOBAL OFFENSIVE # 11 - Live-Stream Teil 1/3 «» Let's Play CS: GO | HD. PietSmiet. PietSmiet. •. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. MariusWoll; 4 videos; 1 view; Last updated on Oct 6, CS:GO Let´s Play. Play all. Share. Loading Save. Trade old skins for new ones. Convenient 5 second trading. 25% deposit bonus! Are You Looking for Original, Quality Content? View Our Fantastic Channel. Fast And Secure Service For Your Inventory. Try It Now.
Hides YouTube & Twitch video lengths, progress bar, & times of related videos to League of Legends, Super Smash Brothers, Counter-Strike, Mortal Kombat. Are You Looking for Original, Quality Content? View Our Fantastic Channel. Counter-Strike-Affäre: Youtuber nimmt dürftige Entschuldigung aus dem Netz Petition fordert, Pewdiepie wegen Rassismus von Youtube zu. I guess Ultimate Strategy Game taught us a lesson. This discussion has been archived. The Werder Bremen Vfl Wolfsburg here is Women also have Kajot Casino, just as men also have oestrogen. I've had to caution a Kaiserslautern Karlsruhe of my friends who "struck it rich" from a single Youtube Counter Strike source like he did. It was theoretically legal, so Valve just let it happen since they're Spielbanken Osterreich pretty hands off and since they Diamons Dogs a cut of sales, they don't Skat Reizen much financial incentive to care either. I'm glad this Hamburg Vs Gladbach is out of the gene pool too. I provided the person who submitted the copyright claim with all of my personal information, including my email Casino Austria Tv, my physical address, my full name, and my phone number. Killing people in a car crash can be accidental. As best I can tell, every state acknowledges felony murder as equivalent to the most deliberate and most punishable forms of deliberate murder.
UNIBET BINGO Youtube Counter Strike der Youtube Counter Strike SpielstГtten.
|Schalke 04 Vs Dortmund||Qualifikation Em 2017 Tabelle|
|Popular Free Ipad Games||Edarling Kontakt|
|Sky Bet Cash Out||84|
|RECOMMENDED IPAD GAMES||Book Of Ra Deluxe Rar|
|BOOK OF RA ONLINE SLOTS PLAY FREE||Fish Frenzy Game|
|Youtube Counter Strike||425|
As soon as I saw this, I went through and submitted my counter notification. In addition to your contact information, you need:.
Now you will get to the most challenging part of doing this. I submitted this on the date I got that original email, on April 5th, I got the email confirming my counter notification on April 7th, two days later.
On May 22, I got the email saying that my video was reinstated. I was frustrated because when you get this email that says 10 — 14 business days from today.
The important thing is the video did get reinstated and the penalty did get removed from my account. I think the default seems to be if you go through this process as soon as you get your copyright take down notification, you go in an submit the counter notice with as much information as you have on fair use or on how you own the copyright.
You get your counter notification received email and then you play the waiting game. The other scenario you can actually get the other party to retract their take down notice.
If you see that in the email YouTube sent, you can actually contact the other party to ask them to retract their take down.
I had been in communication with this person who had initiated this process on my channel prior to them doing this.
Even though I sent them an email, a Facebook message, and a message on another platform, they ignored all of them.
I actually had some type of relationship with the person that did this to my account. They did it knowing it was purely punitive and if you can repair that kind of relationship, you can get a retracted take down also.
Otherwise you may have to sit through and wait through all of these processes I just showed you. I hope all of this is useful for you. Being healthy does not cause us to choose morally good or helpful activities all of the time.
No one of us can say for sure whether this particular case was a matter of mental illness or not, but we shouldn't assume from the start that simply because he did something harmful that he was not free in doing so.
If we are not free to do evil, then how can we pretend to be free to do anything good? If we don't hold ourselves responsible for our bad decisions, how can we claim any merit for our good ones?
Or to put it in another manner: how can we be sure that our good actions are not also the byproduct of mental health issues?
Well, I'm not his doctor, so of course I can't be sure. Had he responded to his setbacks by becoming, say, a bank robber, I'd more more inclined towards your take on it though.
It wouldn't necessarily be depression. Teenage brains are not fully developed. Take one drowning in testosterone, add too much money, and presto: instant dangerous person.
Try the word "murders". Killing people in a car crash can be accidental. This guy murdered two innocent people. I, personally, agree but in American law there has to be an intent to kill.
Merely killing with a full knowledge that that's the outcome but with no actual intent tends to be considered manslaughter or accidental. The legal idea that committing a felony that risks others and thus constitutes murder is called "felony murder".
As best I can tell, every state acknowledges felony murder as equivalent to the most deliberate and most punishable forms of deliberate murder.
However neither going over nor reckless driving are felonies in California, so "felony murder" doesn't count here. In California, vehicular manslaughter is its own thing, and it in and of itself can be either charged as a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on if the defendant was negligent or "grossly negligent".
Vehicular manslaughter can separately be upgraded to murder usually in the second degree if there was what CA calls "implied malice".
This is a bit vague, but:. Money is a status symbol. It's a surrogate for having any kind of sense. If he wasn't capable of earning millions - if total earnings are capped per unit time, along with total wealth, as per Plato's suggestion, he wouldn't have become addicted.
Nobody becomes suicidal overnight. If instead of holding to some outmoded macho image that was out of style in the 60s and an insurance system that makes mental healthcare highly profitable by doing little and charging a lot, there was a system in place that correcte.
There is no system that "corrects issues early, quickly, cheaply and effectively". Even if mental health services were socialized which they should be, really, because untreated mental illness affects us all , it would still be neither quick nor necessarily effective.
This looks like an extended suicide "I I'll go out with a flash and a bang" type thing. Any reasons for that? Was his star dwindling? Did he have other troubles?
WTF, Slashdot? Murder-suicide is now just some sort of gaming side-effect that needs to be listed on the label? Bring in Kei cars for the teenagers.
I think it's more the fact that the bodies we so badly burned, the investigators were not able to complete straightforwards and standard tasks, like determining if the seat belts were worn by the occupants.
The seatbelt thing is meant to describe the level of carnage that this hormone-filled douche bag inflicted on innocent bystanders due to his inability to control his emotions.
He torched a little girl and his mother so bad the police could barely figure out who he murdered. It has nothing to do with safety. Obviously everyone will be dead in a mph head-on collision.
I hope he burns in hell. That is an interesting theory. They restrict the use of high-powered vehicles until the driver has a certain amount of driving experience -- five years, if I remember right.
In many places in the USA, the highest speed limit is 80 and 85 in a few tiny spots , with people reasonably going 5 over.
You don't need a "performance" [high-powered] vehicle to do that. Now, most would admit that "performance" vehicles may further coax certain [already reckless-leaning] people to do reckless things.
Some people don't know how to control high powered vehicles. Of course, it only takes a short bit of training to get used to them, which I'm sure this dork had.
It basically sounds like he was drunk, rich, or drunk and rich, either way not suitable for being on the road. This event also makes driving laws in some other countries Australia is the first that comes to mind look better than our own.
I take it that Australia also makes it illegal to travel the wrong way down a highway if you're an inexperienced driver?
Face it, going the wrong way down a highway sounds more like a suicide attempt than a failure in driving laws Why would it matter if it's high powered or not?
I used to drive a 90s something Honda Civic which could go over mph. I know of no one who calls a stock Civic a high powered vehicle. It appears the only requirements for McLaren are that if you want their flagship car [wikipedia.
My beat-to-hell, pound pickup truck that's coming up on , miles will still hit mph faster than a lot of cars will. That speed is a pretty low bar for modern cars, and my truck is about the least flashy thing anyone could hope to drive.
I remember when I was new to driving. I ended up using a Mustang for a day, with a , that belonged to a friend. Well that was OK until it started raining and I managed to spin out while trying to make a left turn.
Luckily I didn't hit anything, but I found myself facing directly into traffic, which had already stopped to watch my foolishness. Firefighter here - in my response area we have a single lane undivided roadway with a 50mph speed limit and we routinely see survivors of head on mph collisions.
Airbags play a big factor as do crumple zones, as do seatbelts. As an aside, we sometimes have to pick up motorcyclists with a shovel, and hose away the pieces too small to pick up.
Mass and relative velocity of BOTH vehicles must be considered. If they are moving in opposite directions, then there is more energy in the collision.
They are designed to deform during the crash. This is the difference between an elastic and in-elastic collision.
During the collision, some energy will be lost in deforming of the vehicles. A head on by two cars travelling at 50MPH is definitely worse than a single car hit.
Not this crap again. Didn't they bust this myth on Mythbusters too? It doesn't matter what you hit, a wall or another object travelling at an arbitrary speed in arbitrary direction.
All that matters is delta V. If you were travelling at 50 mph and then as the result of collision ended up travelling 0 mph -- it absolutely doesn't matter what was the object that you hit, a wall, or another car with similar mass head on -- the kinetic energy that you need to dissipate is exactly the same.
Yeah, there are nuanc. Same difference as falling onto hard floor vs falling onto a pillow, from. A head on by two cars travelling at 50MPH is definitely worse than a single car hitting a solid immovable wall at 50MPH.
Now between two equal cars the damage scales with the relative speed difference, regardless of distribution. If you have unequal weights the heavier vehicle will maintain some momentum and thus have less deceleration, which is quite obvious if you consider car vs motorcycle.
Though what happens to the passengers depends on the car, there's some very complex systems to soften the impact of the deceleration.
If you connected a solid steel rod from the front of the car to the car seat people would die real quick. Two cars colliding frontal with 50 mph each, is equivalent to one car hitting a standing car wall with mph.
It seems intuitive, but it's not true, because kinetic energy is not proportional to the speed, but to the speed squared.
For simplification let's assume the vast majority of the cars' kinetic energy before the collision ends up in the deformation of the crumple zones, and compare the energies in the two cases.
In both cases, the kinetic energy after the collision is 0, so by computing the kinetic energy before the collision we can find out how much the crumple zones have absorbed.
Your conclusion is correct but you're off with the kinetic energy formula. The formula presumes an inertial frame of reference; simply put, the "oncoming" object - whether a car or a wall - will have the same relative speed so the KE transfer will be the same mass differences and inelasticity aside in both scenarios.
However, as you point out, the "car vs car" scenario involves twice as much crumple zone - which means for any given relative speed, twice as much energy can be absorbed rather than going into.
What is clear in the linked article, is that a collision between two cars is not similar to a collision between a car and an immovable solid object such as a wall or bridge abutment.
That's not an explanation. If you replace a car with an immovable object, the impact would be the same as one car vs. If you replace one car with a teddy bear, the impact would be the same as a car vs.
Only in a direct head on collision, with two similarly weighted vehicles, where they both essentially come to an immediate halt, is that true.
Most likely the victim tried to swerve out of the way, adding rotational forces and an indirect collision, making it worse. In short if you want to avoid horrible death or long term disability then wear a fucking seatbelt, or don't reproduce because you're mucking up the gene pool.
F1 drivers can handle such collisions, but they use safety harnesses rather than seatbelts. Harnesses, incidentally, that seem less failure prone than seatbelts in the event of an accident.
SUVs are not terribly safe vehicles anyway, but it's hard to see what could have been done here. Airbags on the front of the vehicle? Ejector seats?
I'm not sure either would have worked. F1 drivers also have safety cages. If you would like to play while using third party software that interacts with CS:GO, launch with the -untrusted launch option.
Note that in this case your Trust score may be negatively affected. To help out, you can opt in to the beta by following the instructions here.
In the unlikely event that you launch the game with incompatible files, you will receive a warning indicating the incompatible file and may be blocked from joining VAC-enabled servers.
For developers of third-party programs that interact directly with the CS:GO executable process, we have added requirements that will impact your software.
Additionally, we will block signed DLLs if their functionality interferes with the game in any way.Counter strike, в поиске сервера со всех платных мониторингов! Русский чат, HD, High FPS. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. - CS:GO - Video Clips und Highlights - YouTube - YouTube Counter Strike: Global Offensive Playlist mit Video Momente und CSGO Highlights und. - CS:GO - Video Clips und Highlights - YouTube - YouTube Counter Strike: Global Offensive Playlist mit Video Momente und CSGO Highlights und. Die zwei prominenten Counter-Strike-Youtuber Tmartn und ProSyndicate stehen aktuell im Mittelpunkt eines neuen Betrugs-Skandals.